Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Potassium nitrate — Import value
Potassium nitrate — Import value over time
- Luxembourg
- Rwanda
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 6.9 1000 USD against 6.39 1000 USD in Rwanda, a difference of 0.51 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 129th and Rwanda ranks 130th of 168 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5 1000 USD | 0.428 1000 USD | 18.07 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 4.26 1000 USD | 3.76 1000 USD | 0.5033 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 3.41 1000 USD | 3.29 1000 USD | 0.12 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import value, Luxembourg or Rwanda?
- Luxembourg, at 6.9 1000 USD against 6.39 1000 USD in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import value between Luxembourg and Rwanda?
- 0.51 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Luxembourg and Rwanda rank globally for potassium nitrate — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 129th and Rwanda ranks 130th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf