Malta vs North Macedonia: Potassium nitrate — Import value
Potassium nitrate — Import value over time
- Malta
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 171.34 1000 USD against 167.33 1000 USD in Malta, a difference of 4.01 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 90th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.72 1000 USD | 45.14 1000 USD | 27.58 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2010s | 116.58 1000 USD | 86.81 1000 USD | 29.76 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2020s | 147.88 1000 USD | 199.85 1000 USD | 51.98 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import value, Malta or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 171.34 1000 USD against 167.33 1000 USD in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import value between Malta and North Macedonia?
- 4.01 1000 USD, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and North Macedonia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Malta and North Macedonia rank globally for potassium nitrate — import value?
- Malta ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 90th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf