Norway vs Sri Lanka: Potassium nitrate — Import value
Potassium nitrate — Import value over time
- Norway
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 531.26 1000 USD against 499.38 1000 USD in Norway, a difference of 31.88 1000 USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Norway ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111.11 1000 USD | 276.41 1000 USD | 165.3 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 339.83 1000 USD | 575.31 1000 USD | 235.48 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 603.11 1000 USD | 428.57 1000 USD | 174.54 1000 USD | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import value, Norway or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 531.26 1000 USD against 499.38 1000 USD in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import value between Norway and Sri Lanka?
- 31.88 1000 USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Sri Lanka rank globally for potassium nitrate — import value?
- Norway ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf