Singapore vs Uruguay: Potassium nitrate — Import value
Potassium nitrate — Import value over time
- Singapore
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 291.32 1000 USD against 264.07 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 27.25 1000 USD.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 85th and Uruguay ranks 83rd of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,119 1000 USD | 208.58 1000 USD | 910.23 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2010s | 225.48 1000 USD | 406.7 1000 USD | 181.22 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 169.78 1000 USD | 396.75 1000 USD | 226.97 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import value, Singapore or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 291.32 1000 USD against 264.07 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import value between Singapore and Uruguay?
- 27.25 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Singapore and Uruguay rank globally for potassium nitrate — import value?
- Singapore ranks 85th and Uruguay ranks 83rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf