Albania vs Denmark: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Albania
- Denmark
How they compare
Albania currently reports 71 t against 48 t in Denmark, a difference of 23 t.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.5 times Denmark's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 69th and Denmark ranks 70th of 90 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 147 t | 17,826 t | 17,679 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 148.5 t | 5,796 t | 5,647 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 251 t | 6,530 t | 6,279 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Albania or Denmark?
- Albania, at 71 t against 48 t in Denmark as of 2022.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Albania and Denmark?
- 23 t, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Denmark?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Albania and Denmark rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Albania ranks 69th and Denmark ranks 70th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf