Argentina vs Nepal: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Argentina
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 6,577 t against 6,263 t in Argentina, a difference of 314 t.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 24th and Nepal ranks 23rd of 90 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,387 t | 9,542 t | 1,846 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 8,863 t | 4,803 t | 4,060 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Argentina or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 6,577 t against 6,263 t in Argentina as of 2017.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Argentina and Nepal?
- 314 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Nepal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
- How do Argentina and Nepal rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Argentina ranks 24th and Nepal ranks 23rd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf