Armenia vs Norway: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Armenia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 298 t against 247 t in Armenia, a difference of 51 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Norway ahead.
Armenia ranks 60th and Norway ranks 57th of 90 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8 t | 347.5 t | 339.5 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 78.5 t | 242.75 t | 164.25 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 242.33 t | 251.67 t | 9.33 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Armenia or Norway?
- Norway, at 298 t against 247 t in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Armenia and Norway?
- 51 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Norway?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Norway rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Armenia ranks 60th and Norway ranks 57th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf