Austria vs Zimbabwe: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Austria
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Austria currently reports 5,320 t against 4,974 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 346 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Austria ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 90 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,747 t | 3,287 t | 539.67 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 5,500 t | 5,917 t | 417 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Austria or Zimbabwe?
- Austria, at 5,320 t against 4,974 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Austria and Zimbabwe?
- 346 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Austria and Zimbabwe rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Austria ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf