Azerbaijan vs Estonia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Azerbaijan
- Estonia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1,115 t against 792 t in Estonia, a difference of 323 t.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.4 times Estonia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 44th and Estonia ranks 46th of 90 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.75 t | 18.75 t | 76 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 587 t | 400.5 t | 186.5 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Azerbaijan or Estonia?
- Azerbaijan, at 1,115 t against 792 t in Estonia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Azerbaijan and Estonia?
- 323 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Estonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Azerbaijan and Estonia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Azerbaijan ranks 44th and Estonia ranks 46th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf