Bulgaria vs Malawi: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Bulgaria
- Malawi
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 1,428 t against 1,245 t in Malawi, a difference of 183 t.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 41st and Malawi ranks 43rd of 90 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,385 t | 573.67 t | 811.33 t | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 1,124 t | 3,598 t | 2,473 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Bulgaria or Malawi?
- Bulgaria, at 1,428 t against 1,245 t in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Bulgaria and Malawi?
- 183 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Malawi?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Bulgaria and Malawi rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Bulgaria ranks 41st and Malawi ranks 43rd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf