Chile vs Colombia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Chile
- Colombia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 11,021 t against 8,324 t in Colombia, a difference of 2,697 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Colombia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 19th and Colombia ranks 21st of 90 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94,644 t | 14,494 t | 80,150 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 16,565 t | 5,526 t | 11,039 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 15,746 t | 8,324 t | 7,422 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Chile or Colombia?
- Chile, at 11,021 t against 8,324 t in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Chile and Colombia?
- 2,697 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Colombia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Colombia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Chile ranks 19th and Colombia ranks 21st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf