Colombia vs Nepal: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Colombia
- Nepal
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 8,324 t against 6,577 t in Nepal, a difference of 1,747 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.3 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 23rd of 90 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,140 t | 9,542 t | 3,598 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 12,941 t | 4,004 t | 8,937 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Colombia or Nepal?
- Colombia, at 8,324 t against 6,577 t in Nepal as of 2022.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Colombia and Nepal?
- 1,747 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Nepal?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2015.
- How do Colombia and Nepal rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Colombia ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 23rd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf