Czechia vs Ireland: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Czechia
- Ireland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 2,619 t against 2,613 t in Ireland, a difference of 6 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ireland ahead.
Czechia ranks 34th and Ireland ranks 35th of 90 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Ireland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,666 t | 3,488 t | 1,822 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 3,754 t | 4,617 t | 863 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 2,289 t | 2,208 t | 80.5 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Czechia or Ireland?
- Czechia, at 2,619 t against 2,613 t in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Czechia and Ireland?
- 6 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ireland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Ireland rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Czechia ranks 34th and Ireland ranks 35th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf