Denmark vs Ghana: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Denmark
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 81 t against 48 t in Denmark, a difference of 33 t.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.7 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Ghana ahead.
Denmark ranks 70th and Ghana ranks 67th of 90 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18,024 t | 36,068 t | 18,043 t | Ghana |
| 2010s | 5,796 t | 1,992 t | 3,804 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 4,369 t | 2,449 t | 1,921 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Denmark or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 81 t against 48 t in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Denmark and Ghana?
- 33 t, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Ghana?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Ghana rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Denmark ranks 70th and Ghana ranks 67th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf