Ecuador vs Kenya: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 13,617 t against 9,753 t in Ecuador, a difference of 3,864 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 20th and Kenya ranks 17th of 90 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,420 t | 349.5 t | 1,070 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 34,660 t | 2,577 t | 32,082 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 19,928 t | 8,644 t | 11,284 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Ecuador or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 13,617 t against 9,753 t in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Ecuador and Kenya?
- 3,864 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 20th and Kenya ranks 17th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf