Egypt vs Philippines: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Egypt
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 22,098 t against 20,631 t in Egypt, a difference of 1,467 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 15th and Philippines ranks 13th of 90 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78,875 t | 18,906 t | 59,970 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 39,667 t | 11,185 t | 28,481 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Egypt or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 22,098 t against 20,631 t in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Egypt and Philippines?
- 1,467 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Egypt and Philippines rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Egypt ranks 15th and Philippines ranks 13th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf