Ghana vs Uruguay: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ghana
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 148 t against 81 t in Ghana, a difference of 67 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.8 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 67th and Uruguay ranks 64th of 90 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,836 t | 50.2 t | 1,786 t | Ghana |
| 2010s | 8,116 t | 1,423 t | 6,693 t | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Ghana or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 148 t against 81 t in Ghana as of 2018.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Ghana and Uruguay?
- 67 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Uruguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Ghana and Uruguay rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Ghana ranks 67th and Uruguay ranks 64th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf