Guatemala vs Zambia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Guatemala
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 4,035 t against 3,547 t in Guatemala, a difference of 488 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zambia ahead.
Guatemala ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 31st of 90 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,385 t | 271.29 t | 1,113 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 4,520 t | 2,878 t | 1,642 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Guatemala or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 4,035 t against 3,547 t in Guatemala as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Guatemala and Zambia?
- 488 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Guatemala and Zambia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Guatemala ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 31st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf