India vs Kyrgyzstan: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
India
0 t
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
0 t
in 2018
India rank
82nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
82nd
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- India
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
India currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was India ahead.
India ranks 82nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 82nd of 90 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.91 million t | 8 t | 1.91 million t | India |
| 2010s | 6,932 t | 0 t | 6,932 t | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, India or Kyrgyzstan?
- India, at 0 t against 0 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between India and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 t, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do India and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- India ranks 82nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 82nd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf