Latvia vs Madagascar: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Latvia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 642 t against 597 t in Latvia, a difference of 45 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Madagascar ahead.
Latvia ranks 49th and Madagascar ranks 48th of 90 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 365.25 t | 419.5 t | 54.25 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 61 t | 203 t | 142 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Latvia or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 642 t against 597 t in Latvia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Latvia and Madagascar?
- 45 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Madagascar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Madagascar rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Latvia ranks 49th and Madagascar ranks 48th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf