Maldives vs Oman: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Maldives
5 t
in 2023
Oman
0 t
in 2022
Maldives rank
79th
Oman rank
82nd
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Maldives
- Oman
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 5 t against 0 t in Oman, a difference of 5 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 79th and Oman ranks 82nd of 90 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.2 t | 184 t | 174.8 t | Oman |
| 2010s | 4 t | 326 t | 322 t | Oman |
| 2020s | 1 t | 0 t | 1 t | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Maldives or Oman?
- Maldives, at 5 t against 0 t in Oman as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Maldives and Oman?
- 5 t, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Oman?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Maldives and Oman rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Maldives ranks 79th and Oman ranks 82nd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf