Nicaragua vs Sweden: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Nicaragua
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 2,403 t against 1,707 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 696 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.4 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 36th of 90 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,296 t | 1,649 t | 353.12 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 2,285 t | 2,403 t | 118 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Nicaragua or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 2,403 t against 1,707 t in Nicaragua as of 2020.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Nicaragua and Sweden?
- 696 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sweden?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Nicaragua and Sweden rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Nicaragua ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 36th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf