Senegal vs Slovakia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Senegal
- Slovakia
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 363 t against 270 t in Slovakia, a difference of 93 t.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.3 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 55th and Slovakia ranks 58th of 90 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 531 t | 290 t | 241 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 536.33 t | 713.67 t | 177.33 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Senegal or Slovakia?
- Senegal, at 363 t against 270 t in Slovakia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Senegal and Slovakia?
- 93 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Slovakia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Senegal and Slovakia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Senegal ranks 55th and Slovakia ranks 58th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf