Senegal vs Slovenia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Senegal
363 t
in 2019
Slovenia
353 t
in 2024
Senegal rank
55th
Slovenia rank
56th
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Senegal
- Slovenia
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 363 t against 353 t in Slovenia, a difference of 10 t.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Senegal ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 56th of 90 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 531 t | 281 t | 250 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 536.33 t | 233.67 t | 302.67 t | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Senegal or Slovenia?
- Senegal, at 363 t against 353 t in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Senegal and Slovenia?
- 10 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Slovenia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Senegal and Slovenia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Senegal ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 56th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf