Singapore vs Uruguay: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Singapore
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 148 t against 91 t in Singapore, a difference of 57 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.6 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 66th and Uruguay ranks 64th of 90 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.25 t | 44.25 t | 33 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 73.5 t | 223 t | 149.5 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use, Singapore or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 148 t against 91 t in Singapore as of 2018.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use between Singapore and Uruguay?
- 57 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Singapore and Uruguay rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — agricultural use?
- Singapore ranks 66th and Uruguay ranks 64th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf