Chile vs Norway: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity over time
- Chile
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 829.14 t against 696.3 t in Chile, a difference of 132.84 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 36th and Norway ranks 34th of 83 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 122,604 t | 566.6 t | 122,038 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 56,325 t | 941.52 t | 55,384 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 8,936 t | 1,125 t | 7,811 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity, Chile or Norway?
- Norway, at 829.14 t against 696.3 t in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity between Chile and Norway?
- 132.84 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Norway?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Norway rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity?
- Chile ranks 36th and Norway ranks 34th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf