Czechia vs Zimbabwe: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity over time
- Czechia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,140 t against 1,127 t in Czechia, a difference of 13 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,183 t | 77.13 t | 1,105 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 150.79 t | 1 t | 149.79 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 689.02 t | 1,140 t | 450.98 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity, Czechia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,140 t against 1,127 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity between Czechia and Zimbabwe?
- 13 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Zimbabwe rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity?
- Czechia ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf