Ecuador vs Malaysia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 236.32 t against 192 t in Ecuador, a difference of 44.32 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malaysia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 47th and Malaysia ranks 44th of 83 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.75 t | 267.25 t | 228.51 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 186.8 t | 830.22 t | 643.42 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 67.35 t | 312.18 t | 244.83 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity, Ecuador or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 236.32 t against 192 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity between Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 44.32 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 47th and Malaysia ranks 44th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf