France vs Namibia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity over time
- France
- Namibia
How they compare
France currently reports 7,138 t against 5,022 t in Namibia, a difference of 2,116 t.
That makes France's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
France ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 21st of 83 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20,839 t | 1.32 t | 20,838 t | France |
| 2010s | 9,983 t | 0.055 t | 9,983 t | France |
| 2020s | 2,997 t | 1,257 t | 1,740 t | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity, France or Namibia?
- France, at 7,138 t against 5,022 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity between France and Namibia?
- 2,116 t, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do France and Namibia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity?
- France ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 21st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf