Japan vs Luxembourg: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity over time
- Japan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Japan currently reports 49.47 t against 49.47 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Japan ranks 57th and Luxembourg ranks 57th of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 t | 5.8 t | 0.8 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 75.15 t | 42.48 t | 32.67 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 399.98 t | 33.65 t | 366.33 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity, Japan or Luxembourg?
- Japan, at 49.47 t against 49.47 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity between Japan and Luxembourg?
- 0 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Luxembourg?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Luxembourg rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity?
- Japan ranks 57th and Luxembourg ranks 57th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf