Mauritius vs Serbia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity over time
- Mauritius
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 14.7 t against 10 t in Mauritius, a difference of 4.7 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.5 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 64th of 83 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.96 t | 10.69 t | 6.73 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 10 t | 0.38 t | 9.62 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity, Mauritius or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 14.7 t against 10 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity between Mauritius and Serbia?
- 4.7 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Mauritius and Serbia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity?
- Mauritius ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 64th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf