Romania vs Ukraine: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity over time
- Romania
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 29.15 t against 16.6 t in Romania, a difference of 12.55 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.8 times Romania's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 63rd and Ukraine ranks 60th of 83 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.1 t | 6,444 t | 6,442 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 4.94 t | 1,202 t | 1,197 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 22.82 t | 29.15 t | 6.33 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity, Romania or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 29.15 t against 16.6 t in Romania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity between Romania and Ukraine?
- 12.55 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Ukraine?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Romania and Ukraine rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — export quantity?
- Romania ranks 63rd and Ukraine ranks 60th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf