Angola vs Ethiopia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Angola
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 537.77 t against 513.89 t in Angola, a difference of 23.88 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Angola ranks 89th and Ethiopia ranks 87th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.77 t | 189.84 t | 156.06 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 340.41 t | 190.75 t | 149.66 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 1,219 t | 286.3 t | 932.84 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Angola or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 537.77 t against 513.89 t in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Angola and Ethiopia?
- 23.88 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Ethiopia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Ethiopia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Angola ranks 89th and Ethiopia ranks 87th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf