Bahrain vs Congo: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Bahrain
- Congo
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 5 t against 3.69 t in Congo, a difference of 1.31 t.
That makes Bahrain's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 140th and Congo ranks 143rd of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.25 t | 40.49 t | 0.24 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 12.05 t | 2.5 t | 9.55 t | Bahrain |
| 2020s | 11.91 t | 19.55 t | 7.64 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Bahrain or Congo?
- Bahrain, at 5 t against 3.69 t in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Bahrain and Congo?
- 1.31 t, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Congo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Bahrain and Congo rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Bahrain ranks 140th and Congo ranks 143rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf