Belarus vs Benin: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Belarus
- Benin
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 14.65 t against 10 t in Benin, a difference of 4.65 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Benin's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 131st and Benin ranks 134th of 168 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Benin | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 477.09 t | 10.39 t | 466.7 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 590.42 t | 358.31 t | 232.11 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 134.85 t | 12.38 t | 122.47 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Belarus or Benin?
- Belarus, at 14.65 t against 10 t in Benin as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Belarus and Benin?
- 4.65 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Benin?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Benin rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Belarus ranks 131st and Benin ranks 134th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf