Chile vs Myanmar: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Chile
- Myanmar
How they compare
Chile currently reports 18,569 t against 16,800 t in Myanmar, a difference of 1,769 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 25th and Myanmar ranks 28th of 168 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,287 t | 183.67 t | 5,103 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 20,160 t | 95.17 t | 20,065 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 24,072 t | 4,842 t | 19,230 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Chile or Myanmar?
- Chile, at 18,569 t against 16,800 t in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Chile and Myanmar?
- 1,769 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Myanmar?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Myanmar rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Chile ranks 25th and Myanmar ranks 28th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf