Congo vs Lesotho: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Congo
- Lesotho
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.69 t against 3.66 t in Lesotho, a difference of 0.03 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Lesotho ahead.
Congo ranks 143rd and Lesotho ranks 144th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4 t | 4.25 t | 0.85 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 10.25 t | 33.23 t | 22.98 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 19.55 t | 1.1 t | 18.45 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Congo or Lesotho?
- Congo, at 3.69 t against 3.66 t in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Congo and Lesotho?
- 0.03 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Lesotho?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Lesotho rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Congo ranks 143rd and Lesotho ranks 144th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf