Croatia vs Honduras: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Croatia
- Honduras
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 2,311 t against 2,249 t in Honduras, a difference of 62 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 64th and Honduras ranks 66th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,510 t | 1,209 t | 1,301 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 2,221 t | 2,624 t | 402.45 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 2,155 t | 3,118 t | 962.47 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Croatia or Honduras?
- Croatia, at 2,311 t against 2,249 t in Honduras as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Croatia and Honduras?
- 62 t, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Honduras?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Honduras rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Croatia ranks 64th and Honduras ranks 66th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf