Cuba vs Mongolia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Cuba
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.1 t against 0.05 t in Cuba, a difference of 0.05 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.0 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 159th and Mongolia ranks 157th of 168 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,110 t | 0.005 t | 4,110 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 792.1 t | 20.08 t | 772.02 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 488.93 t | 6.17 t | 482.76 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Cuba or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.1 t against 0.05 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Cuba and Mongolia?
- 0.05 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mongolia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Mongolia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Cuba ranks 159th and Mongolia ranks 157th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf