Denmark vs Uganda: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Denmark
- Uganda
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 3,214 t against 2,455 t in Uganda, a difference of 759 t.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.3 times Uganda's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 63rd of 168 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,631 t | 68.45 t | 6,563 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 14,520 t | 251.27 t | 14,269 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 7,769 t | 1,342 t | 6,427 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Denmark or Uganda?
- Denmark, at 3,214 t against 2,455 t in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Denmark and Uganda?
- 759 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Uganda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Uganda rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Denmark ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 63rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf