Estonia vs Libya: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Estonia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 298.34 t against 289.34 t in Estonia, a difference of 9 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 99th and Libya ranks 98th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.76 t | 163.74 t | 139.98 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 1,142 t | 390.01 t | 752.36 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 324.99 t | 516.36 t | 191.37 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Estonia or Libya?
- Libya, at 298.34 t against 289.34 t in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Estonia and Libya?
- 9 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Libya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Libya rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Estonia ranks 99th and Libya ranks 98th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf