Ethiopia vs Latvia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 553.95 t against 537.77 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 16.18 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 84th of 168 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 189.84 t | 278.66 t | 88.83 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 190.75 t | 269.31 t | 78.55 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 286.3 t | 924.01 t | 637.71 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Ethiopia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 553.95 t against 537.77 t in Ethiopia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Ethiopia and Latvia?
- 16.18 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Latvia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 84th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf