Fiji vs Guinea: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Fiji
100.4 t
in 2024
Guinea
96 t
in 2024
Fiji rank
113th
Guinea rank
114th
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Fiji
- Guinea
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 100.4 t against 96 t in Guinea, a difference of 4.4 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea ahead.
Fiji ranks 113th and Guinea ranks 114th of 168 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.07 t | 155.03 t | 144.96 t | Guinea |
| 2010s | 8.31 t | 317.44 t | 309.13 t | Guinea |
| 2020s | 60.52 t | 133.34 t | 72.82 t | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Fiji or Guinea?
- Fiji, at 100.4 t against 96 t in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Fiji and Guinea?
- 4.4 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Guinea rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Fiji ranks 113th and Guinea ranks 114th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf