Germany vs Indonesia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Germany
- Indonesia
How they compare
Germany currently reports 9,416 t against 9,371 t in Indonesia, a difference of 45 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Indonesia ahead.
Germany ranks 35th and Indonesia ranks 36th of 168 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,885 t | 6,029 t | 2,856 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 20,310 t | 4,721 t | 15,589 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 8,507 t | 6,132 t | 2,375 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Germany or Indonesia?
- Germany, at 9,416 t against 9,371 t in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Germany and Indonesia?
- 45 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Indonesia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Germany and Indonesia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Germany ranks 35th and Indonesia ranks 36th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf