Ghana vs Libya: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Ghana
- Libya
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 327.22 t against 298.34 t in Libya, a difference of 28.88 t.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Ghana ranks 97th and Libya ranks 98th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,865 t | 163.74 t | 1,701 t | Ghana |
| 2010s | 329.16 t | 390.01 t | 60.85 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 367.14 t | 555.44 t | 188.3 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Ghana or Libya?
- Ghana, at 327.22 t against 298.34 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Ghana and Libya?
- 28.88 t, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Libya?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Libya rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Ghana ranks 97th and Libya ranks 98th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf