Libya vs Yemen: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Libya
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 376.33 t against 298.34 t in Libya, a difference of 77.99 t.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Yemen ahead.
Libya ranks 98th and Yemen ranks 95th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.09 t | 40.76 t | 20.67 t | Yemen |
| 2010s | 203.82 t | 288.55 t | 84.72 t | Yemen |
| 2020s | 570.86 t | 475.04 t | 95.82 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Libya or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 376.33 t against 298.34 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Libya and Yemen?
- 77.99 t, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Yemen?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Yemen rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Libya ranks 98th and Yemen ranks 95th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf