Mauritius vs Yemen: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Mauritius
- Yemen
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 382.14 t against 376.33 t in Yemen, a difference of 5.81 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 94th and Yemen ranks 95th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 139.1 t | 40.76 t | 98.34 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1,424 t | 241.22 t | 1,183 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 373.02 t | 475.04 t | 102.02 t | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Mauritius or Yemen?
- Mauritius, at 382.14 t against 376.33 t in Yemen as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Mauritius and Yemen?
- 5.81 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Yemen?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Yemen rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Mauritius ranks 94th and Yemen ranks 95th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf