Qatar vs Singapore: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity over time
- Qatar
- Singapore
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 200.05 t against 194.3 t in Singapore, a difference of 5.75 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Qatar ahead.
Qatar ranks 103rd and Singapore ranks 104th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.33 t | 31.58 t | 23.26 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 70.18 t | 267.5 t | 197.32 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 271.78 t | 156.17 t | 115.61 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity, Qatar or Singapore?
- Qatar, at 200.05 t against 194.3 t in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity between Qatar and Singapore?
- 5.75 t, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Singapore?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Qatar and Singapore rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import quantity?
- Qatar ranks 103rd and Singapore ranks 104th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf