Cuba vs Gambia: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value over time
- Cuba
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 4.91 1000 USD against 4.33 1000 USD in Cuba, a difference of 0.58 1000 USD.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 144th and Gambia ranks 142nd of 168 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 812.03 1000 USD | 9.43 1000 USD | 802.61 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 476.48 1000 USD | 9.29 1000 USD | 467.19 1000 USD | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value, Cuba or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 4.91 1000 USD against 4.33 1000 USD in Cuba as of 2017.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value between Cuba and Gambia?
- 0.58 1000 USD, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Gambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Cuba and Gambia rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value?
- Cuba ranks 144th and Gambia ranks 142nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf