Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United States of America: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value

Democratic Republic of the Congo
130.44 1000 USD
in 2023
United States of America
78,381 1000 USD
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
10th
United States of America rank
8th

Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United States of America
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k200220132024

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 78,381 1000 USD against 130.44 1000 USD in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 78,251 1000 USD.

That makes United States of America's figure about 600.9 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 10th and United States of America ranks 8th of 11 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 46.98 1000 USD 32,609 1000 USD 32,563 1000 USD United States of America
2010s 169.03 1000 USD 49,717 1000 USD 49,548 1000 USD United States of America
2020s 181.65 1000 USD 70,491 1000 USD 70,309 1000 USD United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value, Democratic Republic of the Congo or United States of America?
United States of America, at 78,381 1000 USD against 130.44 1000 USD in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United States of America?
78,251 1000 USD, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United States of America?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United States of America rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 10th and United States of America ranks 8th of 11 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United States of America: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/potassium-sulphate-sulphate-of-potash-sop-import-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/potassium-sulphate-sulphate-of-potash-sop-import-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-states-of-america/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United States of America: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
211 places, 4,065 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf